Amateur Pornstar Killer

4/10
Pros: 
Effectively creepy
Reasonably good acting
Reason to be optimistic for better quality sequels
Cons: 
Too Long
No story to absorb dullness
Sound
director: 
Shane Ryan
Year: 
2006
MPAA Rating: 
X
Company: 
Alter-Ego Cinema

On the special features for “Amateur Pornstar Killer” director/star Shane Ryan cites “8mm” as inspiration for his micro-budget sleaze fest. He explains that the short 'snuff' piece at the center of the “8mm” plot was what really fired his imagination. Ryan is has a good eye for material; the snippet is an entrancing little slice of verite that is both effective and enduring. The potency of this grimy bit of footage is made plain by one laborious pass through the entirety of the tepid, turn of the millennium Nic Cage vehicle. Most of “8mm” forwards a vision of underground porn that is more in line with the dark ideas of 1979’s “Hardcore” than it is in-step with the eruption of DIY internet porn that was already old news by 1999. Add to this Cage’s performance, which comes closer to hemorrhoid agony than moral outrage and “8mm” turns from dark exploration to outrageous farce in the blink of an eye.

Anyway, we’re talking about “Amateur Pornstar Killer”. The film, video, is a first person follow along. Brandon is a lonely man cruising the darkened streets of Anytown, USA in his car. He picks up a girl (Stacy) and convinces her to accompany him back to his motel room. The audience takes the ill-advised trip with them and watches as the seduction unfolds (in what is essentially a single shot) over the first 40 minutes. Eventually Brandon pushes Stacy into sex, despite learning that the girl lied about being of age and is actually 13 years old. The sex is coercive and creepy and is a logical prelude to the violent end of their liaison.

As a vehicle for courting controversy “Amateur Pornstar Killer” will no doubt hit its mark with some of the audience. The acting is well above average for this level of budget and its mostly real time lay-out does add authenticity to the movie. The wrinkles that emerge are somewhat disturbing and the deliberately poor camera work conveys the immediacy of the situation.

The first big problem with the film is in the area of sound. With the boom of viral quickies on the internet the average audience is pretty good about bearing with things that sound like the mic was buried in dogshit at the time of recording. The problem is you have to be an advanced crap sculptor to navigate a full 70 minutes of sub-bad sound. Here they apply a couple fixes, namely, subtitles and an enveloping score. Both options could have been efficient if applied with more care and regularity. Instead these devices come and drop off with little regard for natural transition points.

Given the title and initial set-up the film probably has limited options as far as where to take the action. After 20 minutes the endpoint is very much foreseeable, and aside from one small declaration the characters head toward that conclusion without revelation or pathos. Still the movie does carry some power provided you can surrender to sitting in on the mundane moments that often precede many dramatic real-life events. The problem is that in the context of film, the creators should make some decisions for the sake of the audience, like including a story.

With no clear cut narrative we are forced to search for meaning and emotion within a glacially paced conversation between strangers. If the idea here was to give us time to absorb more of the victim’s character so that we will feel her loss more profoundly when she dies, then Ryan and company needed to spend more time on her story. Without a story of any complexity to drive the film, the audience is almost forced to focus on technique. This is unfortunate for a movie like this because the suspension of disbelief evaporates rapidly when the viewers start asking themselves things like, “Why does a film shot entirely on video have artifacts like film grain, sprocket shake and hairs in the camera gate?”

There is an art to making the audience sit with disquieting ideas and images. This is because the viewer adjusts quickly, so in order to continuously unsettle them you’d better keep upping the ante, especially if your film lacks a formal story. In this sense, “Amateur Pornstar Killer” could well be described as “August Underground”-Lite. While the August Underground films may push the viewer along with no real plot objective, the films are first person splatterfests with a whole lot of movement and mania. When an AU set-up runs out of juice it is on to the next one. Splatter aside, “Amateur Pornstar Killer” might have worked well as a short segment in an August Underground film but as a standalone feature length film, it eventually becomes a chore to watch.

Okay, I have been pretty hard on this movie. I will say this; it gave me room to wonder how the follow-ups improved on the original. I won’t recommend it, but I would watch a sequel in the interest of seeing if they addressed any of the issues that held this one back. There’s an extreme cinema seed here that could grow if nourished correctly. I’d stake another 70 minutes of my time to find out if they improved on the formula.

Around the Web

What's New?

We talk about Joe's feelings. ALL of them.

Podcast

So this one's quite the... head-scratcher...

Podcast

Latest Reviews

Search

Around The Web