Advertisement
Latest Feature
Coming Soon
Latest Episode
Advertisement
The Happening
"The Happening" starts on a sunny day in Central Park. People are walking to work, exercising their pets, and generally going about the every day things they normally would. They're all interrupted however by a sweeping wind and a scream in the distance. Immediately afterwards, everyone in the park begins talking strangely, staring in the distance, walking backwards, and eventually killing themselves. Cut to a nearby construction site. A man falls from a high ledge he's working on, then another, then a gaggle all fall to their death as their comrades look on in horror.
We then cut to a Philadelphia high school, where science teacher Elliot Moore (Mark Wahlberg) is trying to pique his children's interest in the (real life) epidemic sweeping the country over the last few years of bees up and abandoning their colonies for no discernible reason. An interesting discussion, except that Wahlberg (and Shyamalan for that matter) fail to mention the real reason why that's scary... that our entire food chain depends on the honey bee and the honey bee alone. A strange exclusion for a film so bent on making us fear nature's wrath.
Once the children and teachers get word of what's happening. Wahlberg returns home to his distant wife Alma (Zoey Deschanel), gathers her up and heads for the train station. There he meets up with math teacher and colleague Julian (John Leguizamo... ugh) and his younger daughter. They all hop on a train to escape the city, along with throngs of other passengers. Along the way, word comes down that the same instances of mass suicide are happening all across the Northeastern US.
The government's best guess is some type of biological attack, with a nerve agent that seems to reverse the instinctual will to survive in humans, causing them to end their own life. Panic sets in when the train is stopped, and the passengers are informed that all train service has halted for good because they've "lost contact with everyone". A ragtag group of people now find themselves stranded in a small Philadelphia town, cut off from society and forced to try and stay alive while making some sort of sense about what is happening.
Whew, okay. Now, right off the bat I have to say, that casting Mark Wahlberg in this film ruins it from almost the first frame. Let me explain something for those who aren't aware... Mark Wahlberg is a dick. Had I to hazard a guess as to what his daily routine is like, I'd say that he fills his days by tripping old ladies and punching little children. Did you see "The Departed"? That's him in real life. Trying to act like a science teacher, he looks like a lost high school kid in his first dramatic role. He doesn't know how act mild mannered and cowardly, so he tries to do it by making everything he says sound like a question. Deschanel does nothing to help him out, except for make the same bizarre, sort of cute faces she's known for. Needless to say, she's also out of place. Throw in Leguizamo, and some of the scenes with the three of them are the most stilted, awkward, borderline retarded exchanges I have ever seen committed to film.
After the opening act, the rest of the film consists of our main trio wandering around small town Pennsylvania and trying to stay alive. In the process, Wahlberg is racking his brain to try and figure out exactly what is happening. And he does... sort of. Don't worry M. Night haters, there's no real "twist" here. There's more of a revelation about halfway through the film that if you're like me, will make you groan out loud. It also sort of ruins the suspense, because everything from there on out consists of the characters running away from the wind... you'll have to see it to understand what I mean.
And there are a handful of reasons that you might actually want to sit through this. Given the lesser constraints of the R rating, Shyamalan does throw in a couple of "oh snap" moments for the audience. A nice car crash here, kid getting shot there, and the occasional corpse-tree are enough to at least keep you engaged. In addition to the moments that do work though, there are also a handful of uninspired scares that only make you jump because of the unnaturally loud noise that accompanies them.
I have to say also, that at a certain point this film made an interesting turn for me, and became one of the most unintentionally funny movies I've seen in a long time. Wahlberg's bizarre delivery is only the first of a laundry list of things you'll find to laugh at. And despite the fact that I didn't like it, I actually found myself continually curious as to what ridiculous thing was going to happen next. M. Night even tries his hand at comedy here, with a surprising amount of light dialog exchanges thrown in. I have to say, some of them did actually make me laugh. But when the rest of the film is an incredibly serious and earnest end of the world story, those moments seem embarrassingly out of place.
Perhaps my biggest frustration with this entire affair, is that when it's all over there is no real explanation as to what is happening (ironic, eh?). You can almost see the motivation. Shyamalan has been slammed for his exposition heavy twists for so long, that it seems as if he's intentionally left this film as wide open and vague as he possibly can. In the process, he leans too far in the other direction and leaves the audience feeling unfulfilled. Honestly though, it's not as if I was even invested enough at that point to really care.
At one point in "The Happening", an awkward teenager joins the list of a dozen other characters who turn to Mark Wahlberg and say "Why is this happening"? In the dramatically silent moment that followed, I decided to take the opportunity to turn to my friend and whisper, "because you touch yourself at night". We both burst out laughing, and the funny thing was, no one really cared. That exchange was the most interesting thing that happened throughout the entire running time of the movie, and that's all I really have to say about it.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page











Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
High Hopes...Shattered
Let me first preface this review by saying that after watching the trailers, I was more than excited to see this film. Furthermore, even after friends told me that it had been referred to as "The Crappening," I still refused to be derailed - I had faith in this movie and in M. Night's directing abilities.
However, I was sadly mistaken. I had hoped that M. Night's intention of leaving his audience with no sense of escape and also no sense of comfort had translated. However, that was definitely not the case. Granted, I was disturbed at some points but in reality, the only thing that left me feeling unsettled was the ridiculous dialogue, the poor acting, and the even worse feeling of being spoon-fed M. Night's doctrine of "protect our planet".
I agree with you completely that the moment Mark Wahlberg shows up on film, we remain unconvinced that he is a kindhearted science teacher whose only goal is to educate and inform his fledgling students. Instead, he seems contrived and even ridiculous, his patronizing language making both his students and the audience feel dumb.
I do have to disagree with you though on Leguizamo's performance. Although I am not saying it's top notch, it certainly was one of the best performances in the film, and - SPOILER ALERT - all hope of any redemption for this catastrophic film disappeared with his unfortunate suicide in Princeton, NJ.
I suppose my main gripe with this film (other than the awful acting) was it's pretension in the sense that M. Night almost took the stance of the great informer as he warned all of us "criminals against the environment" about what our horrible actions could potentially lead to. Because the supposed cause of these events was revealed so early on, I felt that for the rest of the film I looked at any plant or shrub with great dismay and distrust...Apparently I was too stupid to formulate my own theory about what was (I’m sorry) “happening.”
Lastly, I’d like to call shenanigans (I think that’s how you spell it) on the one statement that made me absolutely cringe when I heard it - the “Cheese and crackers” exclamation from the military man was so ridiculous that it angered me, so much in fact that I let out an audible groan. We had just seen a woman jab a hair pin into her neck, men jump off buildings, and a zookeeper get eaten by lions but we can’t hear a goddamn expletive?!? I was always a staunch supporter of M. Night (with the exception of Lady in the Water) but for this one, I’m sorry to say he’s on his own…
How many people have already called it "The Crappening"?
I had been looking forward to this film for a month. The first version of the trailer gave me the impression that Shymalan had learned from the flop of Lady in The Water and the mixed reviews of The Village, and was returning to a story that seemed simmilar to Signs. It would have featured a global event, made very realistic to the audience, because of the incorporation of Authentic looking news broadcasts. I thought the people just sort of fell over, after they were hit with whatever the Happening was, and that was it, they died, all sudden like.
then There was the Red Band trailer, Which hooked me like the Red Band Trailer of AVP-R. There were grizzly, creative deaths abound. this seemed like a truly terrifying experience. I mean, what is scarier than people randomly commiting suicide for no reason whatsoever? It really did feel like the movie I saw in the first trailer was different from the movie in the Red Band trailer. I was stoked.
Unfortunately, the movie itself was nothing like the two trailers that had won me over.
When it opened with the two sisters sitting in the park, I braced myself for what I thought was going to be a truly gruesome image. I wondered just how much I was going to be able to take. and then nothing. Everything that was disturbing, I had seen in entirety in the Red Band trailers.
Shymalan even said in an interview that he wanted this to be a film where the audience never got up for popcorn, or talked to each other, because each scene would be more disturbing than the next, and that they would be stuck in awe.
Well, people didn't get up for popcorn in the theater I went to, they got up to leave. There was something disturbing as hell throughout this film though, the overall piss poor acting from every single person in it.
I know you groaned when you mentioned John Leguizamo, Eric, but I actually felt like he was both the most interesting character and the most believable. The scene with him and the other people in the jeep was, I think, the most intense Scene in the film. If only the rest of the film had that level of tension.
You were absolutely right about how they used loud noise to inspire all the jump scares, especially that one with the guys hanging from trees.
And, they should have kept the title as the Green Effect, this film was so goddamn preachy. The first scene with Mark wahlberg just foreshadows everything in the rest of the film. You have his horrible acting. Once again, man, you were right on the money, he does say everything like it is a question. Then you have to have a random quote from Einstein, which is Shymalan's way of saying "Hey, I get the message that all the truly intelligent people on Earth get. I am going to have to drill it into you, sink to your level, so you get it." and That is mirrored in the discussion Wahlberg has with his students.
The preaching machine just keeps on rolling throughout the whole film, but working the hardest when they bring in the two Hippies. The hippie and his little protest about hot dogs almost had me following the four people who had already left the theater by that point.
That brings us up to my last point. Why does Shymalan have to throw in so much tongue in cheek, quirky humor. Is there a need for the hot dog speech? Does Zooey's character have to have a mini- commentary while people are shooting themselves five feet away? I hate people that actually talk like they are in a Shymalan film, (which no one really talks in such an over drammatic way in real life, anyway) always trying to sound clever, but saying nothing.
Actually, that last line says it all--- (SPOILER)This is a movie that is trying to show us how scary it would be if mother nature got sick of humanity, and all it turns out to be is clueless white people running from wind.
So...yah.
I'll save most of this for the podcast this week, but in brief:
There were some things I liked, some things I didn't.
As for the things I liked?
- I liked the 'idea' behind it all.
- I liked John Leguiziamo in this.
- I liked the tension in Leguiziamo worrying about his wife.
- I liked the gore and the jump scares.
The things I didn't like?
- Marky Mark
- Zooey Deschanel... her big dopey blue ideas are adorable, but that's pretty much all she did was stand around and stare and shit in awe
- Running from wind
- As some one said above "Why is this happening?" over and over
- "The Event" over and over
*SPOILERS BELOW HERE FOOLS!*
I can dig the pissed off mother nature bit. I just don't know to focus on a confused Marky Mark and a stoned Zooey Deschanel. If the focus of the movie would have been on John Lequiziamo trying to get to his wife that he can't get a hold of or track down? It would have been a lot better. Easier to get emotionally invested in the man trying to find his scared daughter's mother.
And the fucking mood ring. Talk about a missed opportunity here. There's so much they could have used this for in conjunction to the toxins, as well as his little talk about aura's. Instead, we get visual clues to it, and it turns out to be a story element for their uninteresting marriage problems.
Ultimately? He killed it with trying to make us interested in these two fuck's failing marriage. Why? What point did it play? None. All they needed to focus on was survival and interesting characters; which they killed off in Princeton.
All that aside, holy cameos batman! Did nobody else catch Dante Hicks (Brian O'Hallaran) driving the red jeep Leguiziamo hitched a ride in?
lol, yes
Hells yeah I did. You only see like half of his face in the rear view mirror but I recognized him instantly. I couldn't tell if it was intended as a cameo or if he's just trying to break into mainstream acting. He's not exactly someone that people beyond us "geeks" recognize so readily.
The funny thing is, I could have dealt with preachiness here if it was executed properly. Even "Lady in the Water" had some inspired directorial moments (notably, the very ending), but I didn't even see that here. Shyamalan has officially lost it in my mind. He needs to go make a romantic comedy or something and step away from the thriller game.
I KNEW IT
I knew this would be terrible. At least it was funny.
OK. I'm the asshole.
I fucking loved The Happening. After my review gets printed in this week's newspaper, I'll send it in. 10 out of 10.
lolouis
I love you man, but you've GOT to be kidding me. For serial.
So...
...another Shymalan movie, another round of apologists defending him followed by crushing disappointment. Same time next year?
I'm not an apologist, I am a
I'm not an apologist, I am a real fan of his work.
*I hope that didn't sound
*I hope that didn't sound bitchy...*
Now, now boys
Play nice fellas.
Look, I LOVE "The Village". I've seen it a few times actually and I really think it's a beautiful film. Say what you want about the twist but he was on top of his game in that film as far as creating suspense.
"Lady in the Water", quite simply, is an abortion. It's amazing how a man who showed such a deft hand in his previous films could make such a bad movie. I actually like the concept too, which makes it even more frustrating.
This film reminds me a lot of "Lady". A great core concept that went off the rails somewhere between the original idea and when it landed in multiplexes. It's not as bad as "Lady" actually, which is good, but it's still nowhere near his previous films.
Even if you can ignore the meandering nature of the plot, it's all about the acting and the dialog. I would have been embarrassed as an actor to go out and pimp this movie. And while it certainly will have some kind of camp value down the road, to call it in any way "good" is insane to me.
Cum together.
And that is what is so great about these BGH talkbacks--different people with different points of views on the genre coming together to discuss the genre. I may disagree with you, you may disagree with me, but I really do appreciate this type of non-elitist forum to talk about stuff like this.
And, with that, in twenty years, LADY IN THE WATER will be regarded as a cult classic. Bet me money now!
You're on.
You're on Fowler.
What's really funny is that
What's really funny is that after reading this review every clip I have seen or heard online that has dialouge from Marky Mark is him only asking questions. Cracked me up.
www.drunkenzombie.com